“Blood betrayal”: Allahabad HC rejects the request for bail for the accusation in the case of a sister’s violence

Last update:January 27, 2025, 2:17 pm Ist

The victim deposited a thread claiming that her brother and father sexually abused her for 3-4 years, resulting in a pregnancy in five months.

In his judgment, Judge Singh labeled the case as a betrayal of blood and confidence, emphasizing the severity of the accusations, in which the protector’s roles were reversed grotesque. (Representative image: shutterstock)

In a case that involves a “betrayal of blood and confidence” shocking, the High Court of Allahabad refused to release an accused who would have raped with his father, which led to the task of . The Sanjay Kumar Singh court said: “It is a case of unforgettable betrayal of blood and trust. The hands of the father and brother meant to protect the dignity of his daughter and sister have become weapons of her destruction. “

The accused, namely Pramod, requested repairs under section 439 of CRPC. The accusations against him included rape, aggression and criminal intimidation in accordance with sections 376, 323 and 506 of the Indian Criminal Code.

The victim submitted a thread in March 2019, claiming that both her brother (the applicant) and her father subjected her to sexual abuse for 3-4 years. She also revealed that her attempts to report abuse was encountered with threats, and her task, confirmed that she had five months at that time, resulted from attacks. The situation escalated to a breaking point when it courage with the problem with the number of assistance for women, 1090.

The plaintiff’s lawyer claimed that Pramod was falsely involved and remained in prison in April 2019. In contrast, the accusation vehemently opposed the request for bail, highlighting the corroboration of the victim’s accusations through medical evidence, who revealed that during his examination she was pregnant in 28 weeks. In addition, the consistent testimony of the victim involved the accused and emphasized the odious nature of the crime.

In his judgment, Judge Singh labeled the case as a “unforgettable betrayal of blood and confidence”, emphasizing the severity of the accusations, in which the roles of protector were reversed grotesque.

The Court referred to the decision of the Supreme Court of 2024 in case X vs. State of Rajasthan, which emphasizes the principle of refusing the bail in cases involving hateful crimes, if the process has begun.

Recognizing the severity of the crime, the High Court refused to give a bail to Pramod, invoking the need to ensure the victim’s justice.

At the same time, the court ordered the superior police inspector, Meerut, to urgent the process by ensuring the appearance of the witnesses. Also, the substantive court was asked to register the statements of the witnesses at the scheduled data without unnecessary delays, emphasizing the need for a quick conclusion of the case.