The High Court of Bombay “shocked”, because Thane Court remains the magistrate that the Badlapur meeting was false

The High Court of Bombay expressed on Thursday the “shock” for a judge of the Thane session court, which remained “Finding” of a magistrate investigation, which concluded that there is “substance” in the accusations made by the parents of the accused in the case of sexual aggression of Badlapur that their son was killed in a “false meeting”.

A division bank a Justice Revati Mohite-Dere and Dr. Neela Gokhale Asked how such an order could be adopted especially when the problem was already pending before them.

In particular, the five policemen, who are accused of “killing” the deceased, who was accused in the case of Badlapur sexual assault, approached the Court of Sessions of Thane, seeking to remain the conclusions of the magistrate the investigation, in which it was concluded that the meeting was accused on the day “. “

Shocked by the order of February 21 of the Court of Session, said Mohite-Dere justice, “We are shocked. How can the session judge pass such an order? Isn’t it aware that we are already seized with this problem and heard every two weeks?

The judges asked the public prosecutor Hiten Venegavkar if the state opposed the requests for review of the police before the Court of Session and answered affirmatively. However, the bank seemed not impressed with the answer.

“It is (the order) to overcome the fact that we are confiscated with the problem … When the problem is subjudic, could the court have fun? We do not see any high state objection against maintaining the petition itself. Mohite’s justice observed.

The judge sought to know from Venegavkar if he, being the state prosecutor and also as an officer of the court, was “terrified and shocked too” on the order of residence, to which he answered, “And we are shocked at a world level.”

During the hearing, the judges also called Senior lawyer Manjula Rao that Amicus Curiae In the petition filed by the father of the accused in the case of Badlapur sexual assault, claiming that his son was “killed” in a false meeting.

The bank mentioned that the father of the deceased said in a previous hearing told the court that he did not want to follow the case, citing further “Delay in obtaining justice” for his son. Therefore, the bank named Rao, to help the court as Amicus.

“Lord Rao, we ask you the assistance in this case. There is a report of a magistrate investigation, so you will have to address us if the state can register a wire (against the five policemen), given this report (the state) have argued that a judicial commission is already requested if the CID can be registered or if this is to be registered. It can be registered or if this is the problem. Mohite-Dere justice said orally Rao, who was present in court.

Therefore, the bank postponed the hearing until March 5, for Rao to go through documents and make deposits, as the bank said.

The court heard the plea of ​​the petitioner/father who, among various reliefs, requested a problem in matter, as well as the registration of the Wire against the wrong police officials.

On September 25, 2024, The court noted that it is difficult to accept that the accused, who was not a “strong man”, cannot be overwhelmed by the police officials who were with him. It was observed orally that the police official who shot the accused cannot say that he does not know how to react, given that he is an assistant police inspector.

On December 19, 2024, The parents of the deceased accused told the court that they survived begging on the streets, because no one offers them any job and even had to leave their own house and live on the ways.