Diddy’s lawyers challenge search mandates, aim to suppress evidence in new records

Evidence The federal prosecutors obtained by Sean’s searches “diddy” Combs “Homes in Los Angeles and Miami and other parties must be suppressed, because the mandates who authorized these searches were unconstitutional, the defense lawyers argued on a new file of the court. .

The defense claimed that the requests for mandate for Diddy’s homes, iCloud accounts, phones and hotel room were excessive, excluded facts that could have been favorable to comb and “presented a gross image of reality.”

The highly reduced defense motion does not publicly reveal the specificity of what the prosecutors would have omitted, but said that the requests for mandate have eliminated the important context that the judge magistrate who approved should have seen, including a certain witness that the defense claimed that he had reasons for manufacture and beauty.

“But it worked-the Government obtained its mandates, drained harmful information and then executed its military-style raids,” the defense lawyers said in the file. “Here, rather than to give the magistrate of the review a fair summary, the government has hidden the expulsor evidence to strengthen its case.”

The defense said that some of the most salious details told in the requests for search mandate come from an unnamed producer-1, whose accusations “have never been credible”. What the producer told the investigators is written, but the defense said he “sent stories about his time working for the comb.”

The motion said that the Government does not intend to use manufacturer-1 to testify.

The motion aimed to suppress all the evidence obtained by these searches or to give a hearing to examine the government’s behavior in obtaining mandates.

No comment from the federal prosecutors who will instead provide a formal response in the judicial documents.

Combs has been pleaded that they are not guilty of the conspiracy of missiles, sex traffic and prostitution charges that are based on the accounts of at least three women. The defense claimed that at least one of those women, Cassie Ventura, was a participant in the alleged “rub-off” and not a forced participant as the prosecutors suggested.

The musical mogul denied all the accusations made against him. Combs’s lawyers previously said ABC News: “Mr. Combs has full confidence in the facts and integrity of the judicial process. In court, the truth will predominate: that Mr. Combs has never assaulted or traffic – man or woman, adult or minor.”