Woman from Singapore killed in Spain: DNA from two men found on victim’s clothes

WHAT HAPPENED

Mrs. Fang was traveling alone to Spain when her body was found near a parking area for trucks in the city of Abanilla, on April 10, 2024.

A preliminary autopsy report found that the wounds of the knife and the traumas of the head were the cause of its death, it was reported.

NGO, who was arrested six days after Mrs. Fang was found, was the only suspect in her crime.

The closed circuit television rooms at the hotel where he was sitting at around 17.45 on April 9, 2024, dressed in a hood and black pants.

The local news site in Verdad has previously quoted the prosecutors saying that the NGO drove Mrs. Fang in a parking lot near a restaurant in Abanilla, around 11:00 pm, on April 9, before the car left at 11.45 pm.

According to the report, the prosecutors believe that Mrs. Fang was no longer in the car until she left the park.

NGO returned to the hotel around 2:00 on April 10, wearing jeans and a blue sweater.

The Spanish police have shown that both Mrs. Fang and NGO’s mobile phones were together in Abanilla on the day she died, previously reported the local newspaper Levante El Mercantil Valenciano.

According to the judge who supervises the case, it is deduced “without a doubt” that both Singapore were in the same area and, at the same time, on the day the crime was committed, based on the data provided by the mobile operators in Abanilla.

NGO and Mrs. Fang have known each other for more than 10 years and has been done Beneficiary of his Central Provident Fund (CPF) – a mandatory scheme of social security savings – about six months before her death.

During the period when Mrs. Fang designated NGO as a beneficiary, almost $ 200,000 (USD 148,000) was deposited in her CPF account.

Mr. Manuel Martinez, the lawyer representing the family of Mrs. Fang, previously stated that the 39 -year -old CPF account was over € 430,000 ($ 462,000).

In February, Verdard reported that prosecutors had requested an accusation of murder against NGO, the private prosecution stating that there is “sufficient crime evidence” to judge him.

However, the defense requested the rejection of the case and requested new procedures, including an independent analysis of the experts of the NGO phone and its testimony.

NGO’s lawyer claimed that it is necessary to perform various tests in this case and that NGO has lost contact with his family.