Influence in court on the social media platform that claims the exploitation

A new trial has sent shock wave to the Land of Influencer, while a woman named Alice Rosenblum claims that the content platform supported by celebrities passes, co-founded by Lucy Guo, knowingly distributed sexual explicit material with minors-including itself.

The legal complaint obtained by people claims that the crossings based on subscriptions in which influences, content creators and celebrities share exclusive photos, videos and live transmissions with paying subscribers-it was not just a space for socializing stars to generate their fan base. Instead, Rosenblum claims that the platform has engaged in the illegal distribution of explicit content with minors, who violate the federal laws regarding the exploitation of children.

The process specifically applies the Guo co-founder, together with the people Alec Celestin and Lani Ginoza, as orchestrators of a scheme that would have involved the recruitment of minor girls to create explicit content. The complaint claims that these images and videos have been sold and distributed to paying subscribers on passages both before and after the persons involved were 18 years old.

Never miss a story – Sign -to -you The free daily bulletin of people To be aware of the best of what people have to offer, from news about celebrities to convincing stories of human interest.

“We are proud that we are responsible for those who sexually exploit minors for money and we will continue our unstable efforts,” Lawyer Rosenblum told People.

A representative for crossings issued the following statement in response to the trial for people: “Since its founding, Pass worked diligently to encourage a safe creator platform. We prohibit the loading and distribution of the explicit content and work active to identify and eliminate any image or video that violates our orientations. As with other creator platforms, there may be cases where individuals bypass these features, but once we are aware of a problem, we take immediate measures. ”

The statement continued: “We were hired to protect all our users, especially minors, and we have strict policies to apply our guidelines. We continue to work to improve and continue to improve the features of our platform to achieve our goal of being the safest and safest creator and fan platform on the planet.”

Also, Guo denied any crime, calling the accusations “without merits” on a Sunday, March 2 post on X. and insisting that the crossings work according to the legal and ethical guidelines. He also distanced the company from Celestin, stating that he was never an official employee or pass agent.

“The process, at least as it is related to the passage and me, is completely devoid of merit,” Guo wrote on X. “Some facts: II had zero interaction with the applicant (calls, texts, calendar guests, e -emails, etc.). I have no contact information.”

She continued to add that “I have always taken measures on rapid violations. Both pro-active (when fake IDs are used, mothers make accounts, etc.) and when reports come. ” She also claimed that “no one reported this account until recently and I quickly took measures when it was reported.”

“I do not condemn the actions described, and Alec Cestin was not a passing agent, nor was he ever an employee,” Guo continued. “We are sure that the facts are on our side and we look forward to presenting these facts in court.”

She concluded her post, “Passes is a safe platform for creators friendly with the brand and we have strict policies to apply our content orientations. The conduct described in the complaint is a direct violation of our service conditions, content orientations, and everything is allowed.

However, the process is not the first time that the passage has faced legal issues. Earlier this year, the platform was sued by the Fanfix competitor, who accused Guo and Celestin to engage in unfair business practices and try to recruit creators using stolen confidential information.