Slamming observations against health dharma, sg says that SC must ensure that all religions receive the same treatment

General request of India Tushar Mehta

“Udhayanidhi Stalin participated in a function called” Sănăan Dharma Eradication Conference “. In that conference, he made public statements that something like “mosquitoes”, “dengue”, “corona” can only be treated by their eradication. Similarly, “Sănătaan Dharma deserves to be eradicated”, SG Mehta representing the state Maharashtra deposited in front of a bank led by CJI Sanjiv Khanna, who heard a petition deposited by Stalin who sought clubbing of all phures against him in the states such as UP, Maharashtra, J & K, Bihar. SC indicated that there will be no fresh fir trees without his permission, because Stalin’s lawyers cried by a freshly submitted one in Patna

Opposite of the exemption from Stalin, Mehta said: “One of the Hindus who are tolerant will never talk about cutting the neck, but they have the right to approach the law enforcement agencies that submit criminal wires or complaints.”

Because he was resisted by Udhayanidhi Stalin’s lawyer according to which he cannot be an argument in which only the Brazi Club is asked, the Attorney General stressed that there is a public spirit whose petition is in the supreme court and his public spirit is limited to a religion and “bring all the courts”.

CJI Khanna repeatedly said sg Mehta that he would not enter the merits in this conjuncture, but the top law officer said he wants to place some facts before the court

“Whenever the leaders of a religion that that man with a public spirit follows, says something about another religion, the Supreme Court itself directs the investigation and monitors the investigation. For this reason, said lawyer General, he stressed and this would be a factor relevant to the court. He explained that Tamil Nadu is a wonderful state. He is only against the speech of an individual, namely Udhayanidhi Stalin.

While appearing for Udhayanidhi Stalin, Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi used sarcasm to say that these arguments are for a different audience.

Tushar Mehta, the Attorney General has uninvited the fact that, first of all, he cannot organize a press conference like Dr. Singhvi and, secondly, this is not for any other audience, but he wants the Supreme Court to know the differences between the two situations and asks to hear both petitions together, so that each religion will receive the same treatment.

Mehta referred to a written petition filed by a Shaheen Abdullah in which the Bank led by the then judge of the Supreme Court KM Joseph, which is based only on a restraint that a Hindu leader can use the hate discourse, the Supreme Court has led several preventive preventive steps.

Just like the videography by the police, etc. The mentioned courtyard, on a complaint of the mentioned petitioner, not only directed the registration by the Maharashtra Police, but also monitored the investigation.