The Tlangana HC sets aside the prize against IDL employees

Hyderabad: The High Court of Telangana annulled a decision of the Industrial Court that denied the requests to re -establish the former employees of IDL Industries Limited and its branch, Rural Development Trust. Nagesh Bheemapaka justice has eliminated a lot of written reasons filed by B. Rama Sarma and another 14. The dispute dates back to 1972, when the petitioner joined IDL Industries Limited, a company mainly employed in the manufacture of explosives. Over time, the company has been diversified in agriculture-related companies, including a bull mother farm, a liquid nitrogen factory and a cattle growth. In 1981, the leadership created the Rural Development Trust IDL, transferring more employees under its control. The secretary, acting as an agent of the newly formed entity, issued termination announcements to employees in January 2001, stating that confidence has ceased to exist. The petitioner claimed that, as confidence was an extension of the company -Mother, the employees should have been reinstalled to IDL. It seems that a few other employees were absorbed, but the petitioners were left in Lerch. Their work union initially pursued the issue before the Industrial Court, seeking recognition as employees of IDL Industries. However, the Court was pronounced against them, citing the compromise decree of 1983. The petitioner, not part of this decree, subsequently filed another request before the court under the law on industrial disputes of 1947. The court again rejected the request, considering that the dispute was prevented by the principle of RES Judicata. The petitioner challenged this claiming that the dependence placed by the court on a past compromise decree that involved other employees was replaced. The judge observed that the aforementioned plea was submitted by the workers’ union, while the present case was submitted by the petitioner in an individual quality and, because they were not a party to the 1983 decree, the RES Judicate principle could not be applied against them. The judge also mentioned that the court failed to examine the validity of the end itself, making his decision legally unsustainable. Allowing the petitions, the judge annulled the decision of the court and decided that the petitioners had the right to request the re -establishment.

HC relief for physically challenged bank employee

The High Court Talangana has canceled the punishment “Dies-Non and without salary/remuneration” imposed on a physical challenged employee of the Karimnagar Cooperative Urban Bank. The court decided that, as the bank service rules did not prescribe such a punishment, it could not be legally imposed. The NamavaRa Rajeshwar Rao justice had to do with a written plea submitted by A. Rajaram Reddy, who claimed that he was dismissed in 2011 for disciplinary charges. His cessation was overturned by the High Court, which considered the excessive punishment. It was the case of the petitioner that he was reinstalled as an accountant, but devoid of the rear salaries for the dismissal and was forced to sign an enterprise that gave up his salary request. Counsel for the petitioner, Baglekar akash kumar argued that rula 19 (ii) of ‘the service rules and regular of the karimnagar cooperative urban bank., Karimnagar’ do not provision for impossible of “dies-non and no wage/ discune”. The Said Rule Reveals that the competent authority may impose the following penalties/ punishment on employeees found of incorrect conduct, but not “dies-Non and without salary/ remuneration”. taking any enterprise from the employee. For this, the petitioner cannot be made scapegoat. “The bank claimed that the Supreme Court on several occasions confirmed the” without work without payment “rule. He claimed that the petitioner himself willingly gave the company and could not return to his word now. The judge rejected the bank’s argument and guided the bank to pay the petitioner 50 % of the rear wages in two months.

HC warns against retrospective imposition of GST

A group of two Judges of the High Court of Talangana has guided income officials not to implement a taxation taxation by the GST authorities. The group of the interim chief Sujoy Paul and Judge Renka Yara deals with a written plea submitted by the Indian Medical Association (IMA), the contestation of the Constitutionality of Section 7 (1) (AA) of the Law on the tax on central goods and services, which was inserted with an effect of January 22, 2024, but the effect on July 1, discussion. He noted that the facts were similar and that the Kerala wing, similar to the petitioner, also challenged the disposition in front of the High Court Kerala. As the requested protection was especially against the retrospective effect of the tax request, the group protected the petitioner to a limited extent, while granting time to respondents to respond to the challenge.

Illegal transport of

Cows claim in written petition

Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy from the High Court Talangana had a notification to Shamshabad Sho in a written plea to present unauthorized cattle for slaughter. The judge also indicated that the seized cattle in relation to a wire registered at the Shamshabad police station will not be released until the next hearing. The judge occupied by a plea written by the Gau Gyan Foundation, engaged in the welfare of the cattle and managed Goshalas throughout India. The petitioner challenges illegal transport and sacrifice of cattle in violation of the telangan prohibition of the sacrifice of cows and the conservation of animals. The petitioner claimed that, despite the complaints regarding the transport of unauthorized cattle for slaughter, the police and the veterinary authorities failed to take strict measures, allowing the accused to obtain health certificates and to request the issuance of cattle. The petitioner’s lawyer claimed that the cattle were transported in violation of several laws, including the law of cruelty to animals and the rules regarding the transport of animals. The problem has been posted for additional judgment.

“Beneficiary” supports prejudices in

Disabsal of dalit bandhu benefits

The Surepalli Nanda justice from the High Court has requested a plea that requests an amount in accordance with the Dalit Bandhu scheme, directing the Hanamkonda district collector to consider the petitioner’s dissatisfaction and to take appropriate measures. An Eerla Laxmi addressed the court that challenged the non -observance of the funds within the system, despite the fact that it was listed as a beneficiary in the official records. She claimed discrimination, stating that, while the funds were allocated and available, the officials paid selectively rises to social and political favored, leaving them without justification. She claimed that this violated her rights guaranteed in accordance with the constitution and provisions of the scheduled law and scheduled tribes (atrocities prevention). 1989. The court took note of the procedures issued by collectors in January 2023, which listed the petitioner as a beneficiary for the allocation of funds. He also considered a letter dated two months ago, which was addressed to district collectors regarding the release of benefits within the system and guided the district collector to take the necessary measures.