Donald Trump leads a “complete attack” on the climate

It is no secret that Donald Trump It has zero interest in struggle climate Change and enthusiastically Support Fossil fuel industry. Trump’s victory of 2024 was expect To establish the climate fight back, but in less than two months, its administration has already made irreparable damage to the efforts to approach the climatic changes. This can be observed mainly in key agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the national oceanic and atmospheric administration (NOAA).

For example, EPA is currently WORK At the rewrite found in 2009, which was essential for the regulation of greenhouse gases. That was it initiated By an executive order, Trump issued on his first day. The so-called “finding of danger”, which was without success Provoked In court several times, says that greenhouse gases endanger public health and well -being. It allows the EPA, according to Clean Air Act, to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. If the finding were reduced or, essentially eliminated, that would largely remove the EPA from the climate fight.

“The revision and potential revision of the danger could be the most drastic step that the Trump administration will take on the climate,” says Barry Rabe, emeritus professor of environmental policies at the University of Michigan. “It would support a consensus that takes place on previous presidents and courts, which is the basis of a series of internal and global policy stages.”

Say Michael Gerrard, professor of climatic law at Colombia University Rolling stone This rewrite of the finding of danger would mean that the EPA will no longer be able to regulate emissions from power plants or vehicles. He says that the finding is “the legal basis for most of the EPA under the law of clean cleaning to regulate climate change.”

At Noaa, the Trump administration is Pull Hundreds of workers and show the intention to close some of his most important offices. Noaa works critically on climatic science and times Monitoring, which is required when extreme weather events have hit. Its weather forecast models are also what feeds the applications of everyone’s time, so that the private sector can not only enter and raise weakness. Gerrard says the agency is “decimated” with these dismissals.

The editor’s choices

“He undermines science at Noaa – weather forecast, climatic modeling, etc. – Only by cutting the staff, ”says Ann Carlson, a professor of environmental law at UCLA.

Beyond what happens with the finding of danger and reducing the staff in the agencies, Carlson says that there are several other actions that the administration has taken, threatening the efforts to approach the climate change and will have undulating effects for the foreseeable future.

“Lee Zeldin He tries to argue (the Department of Justice) against the non -profits who received climate financing, ”says Carlson.

EPPA administrator Lee Zeldin has frozen Over $ 20 billion in funds from the landmark of President Biden, the Law on the reduction of inflation, which had to address the non -profit focused on climatic changes. Trump falsely claimed During his recent common address to Congress, the former government candidate in Georgia, Stacey Abrams, received almost $ 2 billion in this background.

Zeldin says he works with the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the potential fraud – although no fraud has been provided. It is believed that this is actually a way to “collect” these funds, so that they can be used for other purposes. Senior Federal Prosecutor – who works for Trump’s interim lawyer for Colombia District, Ed Martin, who described his team as being “President Trump’s lawyers” – it was already assumed resigned Following a request, it helps to freeze the assets of an EPPA financing initiative, when it did not exist, she wrote, “sufficient evidence” to do so.

Related content

As for the Law on reduction of inflation, Carlson says he is worried that the administration will repeal other parts of the climate law. You may believe that electric vehicles would be safe due to the presence of Co-President Elon Musk, but Trump still has no love for EVs beyond those produced by Tesla.

“Trump has made no secret that he wants to revoke the tax credit on the electric vehicle in the law on reducing inflation and maybe other provisions,” says Carlson. “If he does this, this will dramatically undermine the effort to decarbonize.”

Elon Musk had previously claimedOn different occasions, eliminating tax credit could help Tesla. Its thinking This is eliminating would hurt other car companies significantly more than Tesla, which means it could be a net benefit for the company.

The transport sector is the biggest The US greenhouse gas transmitter, so adopting the adoption of electric vehicles would have a substantial impact on climatic efforts. It can also cause car companies to reconsider their attention to the extension of several elders if the consumers interest decreases.

SEAN DUFFY SECRET SECRETARY HAS PUBLISHED A Memo Shortly after it was confirmed by the Senate, focused on the possibility of returning the fuel economy standards for vehicles, which would do additional harm to the climate. The Trump administration also had canceled Efforts for repairing broken electric vehicle charges from all over the country. Energy Department now goes after the energy efficiency of the device standardwhich would be ensured that home appliances use less energy.

“It is a complete attack on the federal government involved in approaching climate change,” says Carlson.

There are many other examples that could be listed, but the consensus seems to be that the Trump administration does everything you can to worsen climate change and makes Americans based on dirty energy in the coming years. Is not exactly surprising, given that he SAPS The fossil fuel industry during the choices they would do virtually anything and they wanted to give it $ 1 billion.

All this happens despite the fact that renewable energy is now in general cheaper than the energy derived from fossil fuels. That being said, the federal government is not the only space in which we see the climate struggle that takes place, and a certain level of climatic actions will continue in the United States during Trump’s mandate.

Carrie Jenks, executive director of the Environment and Energy Law Program at Harvard Law School, says a federal response to climate change cannot be replaced. However, she says that everything is not lost if the federal government does not do what she should do to address this crisis.

“In the absence of federal involvement, I think you will continue to see the states and industry before to address climatic changes and make investments,” says Jenks. “I think there is an opportunity for states to continue progressing and testing things.”

The catastrophic effects of climatic changes become more obvious every year, and the world does not have infinite time to win this fight. While Trump remains in office, the federal government will certainly work against efforts to solve this huge problem. Perhaps other Western nations will climb as the US fakes.