The federal judge seems to have skeptical evidence have been for performance

Baltimore – A federal judge repeatedly sounded skeptically on Wednesday that the Trump A administration mass dismissals of evidence federal workers They were made by the Government, because the employees could not do their job, saying that the endings seem to be part of a bigger goal.

US district judge James Bredar made comments to a hearing where nearly 20 states Look for a temporary restriction order to stop more federal evidence and to reinstall those who have already been dismissed. If the dismissal was part of a large-scale reduction in force, there are certain laws that guide the process.

“This case does not refer whether or not the Government can cease. It is if I decide to cease people how to do it, ”said Bredar. “Move quickly and break things. Move -quickly, okay. Break things, if that involves violating the law, then it becomes problematic. “

The states claim that the Trump administration blinded them by ignoring the laws provided for large-scale redundancies, which could have devastating consequences for their state finances. At least 24,000 test employees have been ceased since Trump has taken over, says the process.

The Trump administration, on the other hand, argues that states do not have the right to try to influence the relationship of the federal government with their own workers. President Donald Trump, Republican, said he is aimed at fraud, waste and abuse in a swollen federal government.

The test workers have been targeted for redundancies throughout the federal government, because they are usually new in the workplace and do not have a complete protection of the public service. Several processes were recorded in mass dismissal. A judge refused to block dismissals in a process filed by unions, finding that workers must go through the legal system of employment. Another one found a memory that is the basis of the redundancies was illegal, but did not immediately block fire or reinstalled the workers.

This is the first trial led by the states and is considered by Bredar, a judge named by President Barack Obama and based in Baltimore.

The Trump administration has brought a new perspective on how the federal government should work, how many people should work for the Government and the work that the government should do throughout the council, Bredar said.

As a result, the judge said, the administration decided to change thousands of people from federal employment, “what can be their prerogative.” However, Bredar mentioned that this case focuses on how they did.

Bredar said that the resignation seemed to be more characteristic of a large-scale reduction of force, rather than to give up test workers, because they couldn’t do their job. Bredar said that employees seem to have been “ceased as a group to achieve a wider goal.”

While the federal agencies claimed that the employees were dismissed for unsatisfactory performance or conduct, the process led by the state of Maryland said that the dismissals were part of the administration to restructure and reduce the size of the whole government.

This means that the administration was obliged to comply with the federal laws and regulations that regulate the federal reductions widely in force, the process said. For example, regulations require government agencies to consider mandate, performance and veteran status of an employee when making termination decisions, lawyers said. Also, the regulations usually require a prior notification of 60 days of termination, in a reduction of force.

Virginia Williamson, Maryland Deputy General Prosecutor, said on Wednesday that states suffer “real and irreparable damage as a result of the failure to announce.” This is due to the fact that states use the information to help the unemployed find work.

“The rapid state response agencies from all over the country need information about the number of employees who will be dismissed in a mass dismissal, such as those that the defendants have made to provide information about resources for employing jobs, information on the benefits of unemployment, to essentially prevent the damages that could be the state, which will be the state,”

Also, the states will suffer financially, because they will have to support the unemployed workers, while they will fight with a sudden loss of income income, she said.

Deputy Prosecutor of the USA, Eric Hamilton, claimed that the dismissal of test workers is not a reduction in force.

“The documents that are in the records of the federal government employees who have ceased show that there is no (reduction in force) and that these agencies made judgments that the evidence were not suitable for the federal government,” Hamilton said.

The other states that join the process are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin. District Colombia is also a plaintiff.

The judge said he intends to issue a written decision “prompt”.