Open you also have Google, after they have long trained the robots of the news of the news as this, they will now throw a law on the copyright established for a long time, arguing, not a child, that the only way to defeat the Chinese Communist Party is for those technological giant to steal the content of human journalists. America.
“With a Chinese communist party determined to overcome us by 2030,” Open AI wrote on Thursday at the Federal Office of Science and Technology Policy, “the new action plan of the Trump administration can ensure that the AI led by Americans, built on democratic principles, can predominate on autocratic, autocratic, autocratic.”
Built on democratic principles? More as being built on direct thefts.
That is why news organizations, including eight sister publications and The New York Times, have sued Microsoft’s Open Partner for violating their copyright law by aspirating millions of newspapers, without permission or payment, which is a violation of copyright on a colossal scale.
Now Open you will return with the absurd argument that this was somehow necessary for national security.
In their letter, Sam Altman’s crew added a lot of a countertop, which is self-serving, about “scaling human ingenuity” and “freedom of learning and knowledge”, while describing the innovations of Chatgpt as part of a great and glorious trajectory of domesticated horses to the power to electricity to the internet.
Do you see the irony there? Press print.
For generations, those presses have sent the activity of reporters in America, the investigated capital fruits and hard work, in town hall and crime scenes and in all the communities they have served. They have amplified and distributed the activity of a news organization, as the Internet now does.
They did not stole the work of someone else and then they passed it as theirs.
The generations of copyright protection for the benefit of Bots would have a cold effect not only on news organizations, but on all creative creators, from novelists to dramaturgi to poets.
This commitment dressed in iron to protect the rights of the labor owners they have created is exactly what distinguishes the United States from communist China, not the opposite.
This country has dominated the world of news and information, respecting not only the precious freedom of the press, but also its right to protect its activity. If he had not done this, there would have been no economic basis to build the types of news organizations that can and still keep control over the Government. Heck, there would have been no economic basis to build anything creative.
Ensuring the permission and compensation quite compensating, those publishers who have created this great foundation foundation is the right, just and American to do.
The government should reject these self -service proposals and protect the activity of artists, authors, photographers, journalists and all other creators and copyright holders who were the victims of these companies.
This editorial is published in more than 60 newspapers and daily websites in the entire Medianews and Publishing Networks.