In All India Judges Association The case, the Supreme Court was informed today on behalf of the courts of the High Court in Karnataka and Gujarat that the recruitment process for the position of civil judge (the junior division) was maintained in the approach, given that the Supreme Court reserved the decision on the fact that a minimum condition for a lawyer must be prescribed for a lawyer.
The problem was before a bank of Justices Br Gavai and AG Massihwho ordered the listed interlocutor requests, given a statement made by Additional General Application Km Nataraj That, because the court decision is reserved, relevant notifications have been issued, and the recruitment process will not continue.
Consider, the bank registered in order:
“ASG learned claims that in terms of the High Court of Karnataka, the High Court of Karnataka has already put the selection process in abenion to wait for the decision of this court regarding the provision of a minimum number of years of practice, while a lawyer, while a lawyer, while beforehand, while the Court of the Civil Court. Previously, while the High Court of the exam of civil judge (Junior Division) is still, to the extent that this High Court of Gujarat is concerned with the procedure, if this is prior to this high court of civil judge (the Junior Division).
In order to regain, earlier this year, the court took into account whether the 3 -year practice condition at the bar, besides a legal degree, must be restored to appear at the examination of civil judge (junior division). This requirement was eliminated by the court from All India Judges Association Case (2002).
On March 4, the Court it remained The process of recruiting the judicial magistrate in class I (JMFC), the Civil Judge Division of Gujarat. He expressed the dissatisfaction with the High Court Gujarat, allowing the recruitment process (advertising on January 30) to proceed without any requirement of a minimum number of years as a lawyer.
In particular, the advertisement issued by the Public Services Commission in Gujarat did not prescribe that a candidate should have a qualification of a minimum number of years of practice as a lawyer.
Noting that he had reserved judgment Regarding the problem, if they should be allowed fresh to request positions at the level of entry into the judicial service, the Supreme Court expressed that the High Court should not have allowed the recruitment when confiscated.
Case details: All India Judges Association vs Union of India | WP (C) no. 1022/1989