Jack Grealish the most recent victim of the lies and stupidity of the sports sports

Get some notification or do you consume the media -mainstream football media?

I ask because last week they were in a typical grotesque form over Jack Grealish. Although their models die slowly, millions still buy newspapers and cannot spend this money in the belief that they read a dystopic version of the truth. They must believe that it is at a certain real level, because who pays money to be lied to?

We will soon be subjected to an avalanche of the most Piggery sports news, when Thomas Tuchel will take his first game as a coach. The Second World War will be retitulated, even if the true enemy is in the west, and the assembled bots will invent bizarre questions that exist only in their own dirty corner of the Media Court.

I have already seen their xenophobic instinctsShared only by some of the outer edge of Radio Talk, which is based on these blood boiling crazy people. He will forget, like many before him, with astonishment to a kind of unique Sports News Pigs in tracking.

Last week, attention was the attention to Jack Grealish and what he did on a free day, even to the extent that his manager was asked about it. It is a non-poverty story about a man in a couple of pubs and the appearance, frequently seen on the puzzled face of Pep Guardiola, of unbelief, as he strives to understand, as any sensitive adult does, he showed how the press is divorced from reality and to live with a sportsman.

However, this is quite typical. The insignificant things are continued for days and are thrown into a big story to continue to feed the cravings for sports news. And that’s it – content. Not quality or truth or facts, just content.

I cannot be the only one who is amazed that the public has anything to do with these organs and their battle between truth and dystopian distortion.

As we know too well, the need for traffic to provide advertising money distorts everything. It all comes down to reporting to a few big clubs and most of all the others are simply ignored. You could be critical for this and few of us would like to be the case in the best circumstances, but this is a simple economy.

But if you have claims to be a registration newspaper, you would think it would have a wider vision beyond making stories that are no interest, for example, “the famous footballer observed in the restaurant just hours after defeat.”

That Mediawatch He points out every day, football pages have their own particular relationship with words, both in terms of how they are used, and what they do or do not mean. They involve unthinkables, invent improbable speculation, overestimates nonsense as if it were important, depending on what Grealish. They write “five things I learned”, four of which are of course. Claiming the records that are not records and any amount of twisted fiction and contortions, all delivered in a lexicon of words that barely make sense. Imagine -are these people who do this? Look, what the sports news pigs became.

Fifty years ago, the tabloids always produced sensationalist meal, but there have always been authentic news. It would not have produced the typical typical modern sports news news and I don’t think anyone was interested in reading about a footballer in a restaurant or in a pub. It’s just … nothing. Reporters had relationships with players and footballers protected by public control, instead of exploiting them.

Why read this at all? To do this, you must think, to some extent, that it will contain truth. But their words mean nothing. Words should make sense and not just tools to create a bizarre fiction. Their history of being liars or truth disorders is long and stored, why fill your synapses with it?

Obviously, it is clear that their approach is, ironically, one of the reasons underlying their decline. The narrow focus, SH*you are superficial, distortions and dishonesty works against them in the long run. Obviously, their web sites attract traffic and from there they see their future, but why click something? Why waste your time? No money could cost you, but it costs you in information, creating a dystopia in which the news and reality are subsumed by the continuous lust for clicks.

It doesn’t matter how or what distortions and lies it causes you to click as long as you click. Standards? You do not mind such inherited principles. Click clicks. Why does a business want to be exposed to that traffic? I never understood why someone continues to advertise the stupid, not to say dishonest sites? Is they because they want to attract people who are gulible and easy to manipulate?

Numbers certainly do not matter if most majority are disabled. Therefore, certainly, newspapers would be better to produce an interesting intelligent content, which leads to longer periods of living and involvement and is reflected well on the brands placed on that content. Is it just naive? He continues to write it because people continue to click on it? If yes, turn off. That will end it, I guarantee it. Do we live in an idiocracy?

Is there more money in stupidity, makeup, endless speculation without speed or meaningless observation? Can there be a constituency for that? In this case, God helps us all, we are surrounded by idiots who taught their minds.

Where are we going? Is it a race at the bottom, appealing only to the indisputability and unambiguous intellectually with the intelligence and thinking limited to a few “elitist” places, led by the news pigs? Or are we already there?

I think you know the answer.