The madness with two levels as ethnic minorities received priority for bail Politics

Ethnic minority suspects are given priority by judges who take into account the bail in accordance with the new two -level justice guidelines.

Judges and magistrates should “give priority” to cases involving ethnic minorities, women and transsexual suspects, because they may have a “higher disproportionate” risk of being withdrawn.

The controversial new guidance also advises judges to consider “important historical events that could have had a greater impact on those in specific groups and cultures.”

This means they might take into account trauma suffered by suspects whose relatives experienced racism or discrimination

The Secretary of Justice in Shadow, Robert Jenrick, said: “Labor tried to spin the public that they opposed” justice with two levels “, but this proves that they can open it.

“From bail to conviction, Keir with two levels presides over a system of justice determined to treat the ethnic minorities.

“Instead of equality before the law, the Department of the Secretary of Justice considers in cultural relativism. This is a blatant attack on the rule of law and will put the British public in danger.”

Judges are urged to consider “additional support” and reports on such groups to decide whether to release people on bail or retain them, according to the guidance issued by the Ministry of Justice in January for the courts and the evidence.

The MOJ guide also emphasizes that it is “vital that the evaluation of the pre-sent report will take into account the fund and culture of the defendant and if they have experienced trauma from racism or discrimination experiences.”

He adds: “It is possible that the trauma has been experienced personally, by those known by the defendant, inter-generation and transmitted to the defendant or as a result of important historical events that could have had a greater impact on those in specific groups and cultures.”

The Secretary of Justice, Shabana Mahmood, is expected to introduce emergency legislation this week to block the orientations. It could also review the role and powers of the conviction.

The work was left “humiliated” after the conviction council rejected the appeals to eliminate its new extremely controversial guidelines, which could see closed white criminals more than ethnic minority criminals.

Judges are told to consider the racial, cultural and religious fund of an offender when they decide whether to impose a custom or community conviction.

The Secretary of Justice, Shabana Mahmood, asked the conviction council to reverse the plans.

But Quango defended the plans on Friday and rejected the calls to change the guidelines, which means they will come on April 1, establishing a confrontation between ministers and judges.

The Secretary of Justice in Shadow, Robert Jenrick, said: “Shabana Mahmood was humiliated by the Sentence Council.

“In three days, we will have a two-level conviction because of it and Keir with two levels. It is shameful that they sat on their hands and chose not to legislate to prevent justice with two levels.”

David Spencer, the head of the crime and justice, the exchange of policies: “The refusal of the conviction to change its position is remarkable – and another example of how, as the exchange of policy has long argued, too many bodies of the arm have received the power to establish the policy and to frustrate the will.

“By defending the prioritization of the pre-sequential reports for the ethnic minority offenders, the president of the conviction council is justice on two levels in our judgment system. The Chancellor has said, rightly

Downing Street said on Friday that “all options are on the table”, including emergency legislation, because the government examines the role and powers of the Sentence Council.

The climbing row between ministers and the judicial system comes after the Council proposed the rules that would have asked the judges to consider the ethnicity of the criminals when passing the sentences.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer He said he was “disappointed with this answer”, adding: “We consider our answer and all the options are on the table.”

The conviction council told Mrs. Mahmood: “For most cohorts, the need for a pre-sent report appears from some characteristics of the offender.

“In the case of ethnic, cultural and faith minority groups, the problem is the need to provide complete information to the conviction court. The Council consulted on the inclusion of a cohort list.

“As I explained in my previous letter, the general response to consultation was positive.

“The crucial point is that a pre-sent report will provide information to the judge or magistrate. It will not determine the sentence. Rather, the judge or magistrate is better informed about the offender.”

The new plans could mean that white criminals are more likely to be closed than the criminals of ethnic minorities.

But the conviction council told the secretary of justice: “As you say in your letter, there is a difference in the results of the conviction for ethnic minorities.

“The Council agreed that any systemic problem about different ethnic groups will be a policy issue.

“It is not for judges to introduce general policies to remedy the imbalance. However, the sentences are imposed by judges and magistrates.

“Any judge or magistrate obliged to condemn an offender must do everything he can to avoid a difference of result based on ethnicity.

“The judge will be better equipped to do this if they have as much information about the offender.

“The cohort of ethnic, cultural and faith minority groups can be a cohort that judges and magistrates are less well informed.

“In our opinion, providing the court to convict information on this cohort could not affect any policy could be introduced to cope with the basic problem.

“The provision of a pre-sent report in an individual case can not have harmful consequences for the broader elaboration of policies.”

Responding to the news that her suggestion was rejected, Mrs. Mahmood said: “I was clear, in my opinion, that these orientations are a differential treatment, under which their results can be influenced by their race, culture or religion.

“This is unacceptable and I have officially exposed my objections in this regard to a letter to the conviction council last week.

“I am extremely disappointed with the council response. All options are on the table and I will legislate if necessary.”